FSC Guts Rainforests
On its face, tropical wood certified by the Forest Stewardship Council sounds a good thing. FSC promises that their wood is procured in an “environmentally responsible, socially beneficial, and economically viable way.” But, if you follow the paper trail, you’ll discover that FSC-certified wood is all too often riddled with controversy.
In addition, the FSC has repeatedly turned a blind eye to human rights atrocities associated with the forestry operations that they certify. One of the most recent examples occurred this year in Brazil when a nonviolent, popular movement of indigenous people and campesinos rose up against an FSC-certified plantation, which they rightly referred to as a “green desert” because of the way it “destroys local people’s livelihoods and environments.” Despite a violent eviction by military forces these affected communities continue to fight for human and environmental rights.
In a 159-page report on the FSC certification process, “Trading in Credibility”, the Rainforest Foundation has collected the eye-witness testimonies of 22 persons who represent indigenous groups, universities and social and environmental organizations from 13 different countries. According to the Rainforest Foundation these accounts indicate that serious problems with FSC wood are “not just isolated ‘incidents’, but…symptoms of structural problems within the FSC.”
Simon Counsell, a Founding Member of the Forest Stewardship Council in 1993, became so concerned about the constant erosion of the FSC’s reliability that he went on to found www.fsc-watch.org, which seeks to watch dog the FSC and encourage debate about its practices.
Counsell states that the FSC has created a “‘race to the bottom’ of certification standards”, alleging that the “FSC really has become the ‘Enron of forestry.’”
Counsell believes that many of the FSC’s drawbacks are due to its tendency to look at each individual logging operation as a separate entity while ignoring the big picture of what industrial logging is doing to rainforest ecology. “Whilst a logging concession might appear to be ‘sustainable’ at this small-scale level, the whole development model that accompanies industrial logging concessions might be highly non-sustainable and destructive,” Counsell says.
“Research in the Amazon has shown that, over a period of years, commercial logging greatly increases the overall propensity of the forest to dry out, burn, and disappear. This happens regardless of whether the logged areas are certified or not.”
Perhaps that explains why Friends of the Earth UK withdrew its support of the FSC last year, and the government of Norway has declared that they will no longer use rainforest wood—whether it is certified or not.
In this video clip, Jane Goodall, the famous primatologist and UN Messenger of Peace, isn’t asking New Yorkers to use certified rainforest wood. She’s asking us NOT to import wood from tropical forests.
Unfortunately, Friends of the High Line have decided to build Stage 1 of the High Line with FSC-certified wood, logged from the Amazon. Due to our campaign, they’ve been forced to defend their use of this wood on the High Line website. Let’s work together to convince them that there is no defense. Friends of the High Line need to use truly sustainable material for Stages 2 and 3 of their project. Let your voice be heard: firstname.lastname@example.org
We recognize that ending the industrial logging of ancient rainforests is critical to addressing climate change, protecting biodiversity, and respecting the rights of indigenous forest-dwelling peoples.
For more information, check out the following:
*Alternet article, “High Crime on the High Line: Why Is NYC’s Highest Profile Park Using Amazon Wood?”
*Rainforest Relief website